Barack Obama, Dolores Huerta, Cesar Chavez, Frank Marshall Davis, Socialism and Communism

In awarding the Presidential Medal of Freedom to California labor unionist Dolores Huerta, PresidentBarack Obama has symbolically re-affirmed his thirty year relationship with the US’ largest Marxist organization, Democratic Socialists of America.

Dolores Huerta, a committed radical, is an honorary chair of DSA and has served that organization or its predecessors for nearly 40 years.

Despite the President’s favor, there is no doubt that DSA is both Marxist and militantly anti-freedom.

In an article in DSA’s Democratic Left, Spring 2007, DSA National Political Committee member David Green of Detroit wrote in support of the Employee Free Choice Act – or “card check.”

What distinguishes socialists from other progressives is the theory of surplus value. According to Marx, the secret of surplus value is that workers are a source of more value than they receive in wages. The capitalist is able to capture surplus value through his ownership of the means of production, his right to purchase labor as a commodity, his control over the production process, and his ownership of the final product. Surplus value is the measure of capital’s exploitation of labor… Our goal as socialists is to abolish private ownership of the means of production.

Our immediate task is to limit the capitalist class’s prerogatives in the workplace…In the short run we must at least minimize the degree of exploitation of workers by capitalists. We can accomplish this by promoting full employment policies, passing local living wage laws, but most of all by increasing the union movement’s power…

Dolores Huerta is no mere leftist labor activist. She is part of the same movement which spawned Obama, indeed represents the California branch of the same socialist/communist/Alinskyite alliance which brought Obama to prominence in Chicago.

Richard Chavez

Huerta was the long-time partner of the late Richard Chavez, brother of United Farm Workers founder Cesar Chavez.

Trained for several years in Chicago, by the great agitator Saul Alinsky, an inspiration to DSA, Hillary Clinton and Obama himself, Cesar Chavez worked with communists and socialists his entire career.

He marched under the famous slogan “Si se puede” – “Yes We can!,” used famously by Obama in 2008 and recently resurrected in the original Spanish version by Latinos for Obama.

When Richard Chavez died, President Obama personally paid tribute to the late United Farm Workers union leader.

“Richard fought for basic labor rights but also worked to improve the quality of life for countless farm workers,” said Obama in a statement. “And beyond his work, Richard was a family man.”

Obama added, “Richard understood that the struggle for a more perfect union and a better life for all America’s workers didn’t end with any particular victory or defeat, but instead required a commitment to getting up every single day to keep at it.”

Richard Chavez was connected to several strands of the movement that would eventually put their finest son, Barack Obama, into the White House.

In 1951, Richard Chavez started a carpenter’s union apprenticeship program in San Jose and found work framing suburban homes. By 1952, he had moved to Delano, California where he served as president of the local chapter of the Community Service Organization, a Latino civil rights group co-founded by his brother Cesar.

CSO, under the leadership of Los Angeles leftist President Ed Roybal (father of current congresswomanLucille Roybal-Allard, mentor to far left congressman Xavier Becerra) and organizer Fred Ross, and with the financial backing of independent Chicago radical Saul Alinsky, became a major force in “progressive” politics in Los Angeles in the 1940s.

CSO created the first broad-based organization within the Los Angeles Mexican-American community. It had also established ties to organized labor, the Catholic Church, the Jewish community and to individuals in both the Democratic and Progressive parties, creating a broad based coalition that succeeded in electing Ed Roybal to the Los Angeles City council and then later to the U.S. Congress.

CSO pioneered, with the assistance of Saul Alinsky, the type of multi-racial, multi-ethnic coalition that would elect Barack Obama to the U.S. presidency some 60 years later.

Both Ed Roybal and Cesar Chavez worked closely with a leading Los Angeles Communist Party USAmember and Democratic Party activist, Bert Corona.

Corona also helped set up the CSO and worked to elect Roybal to the Los Angeles City Council.

In 1959, Ed Roybal and Bert Corona met in Fresno to form the radical Mexican American Political Association. This organization’s mission was the support and promotion of Mexican American candidates within the Democratic Party. The young organization helped set up the Viva Kennedy clubs that, for the first time, brought large numbers of Mexican Americans into a Presidential campaign.

A few years later, a young Latino radical named Tony Vilar was trained by Bert Corona through MAPA. Today, Antonio Villaraigosa as he is now known, serves as the Mayor of Los Angeles. In early 2009, he took a break from that job to serve on the Obama Transition Team.

In 1964, Chicano “civil rights” movement activists including Bert Corona, Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta forced Congress to end the U.S. guest worker “bracero” program. The next year, Mexicans and Filipinos went out on strike in Coachella and Delano, and the United Farm Workers was born. Richard Chavez helped his brother set up the UFW and continued to work for the organization for many years.

Bert Corona in turn owed his career to secret Communist Party member and International Longshore and Warehouse Union leader Harry Bridges.

According to Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America member David Bacon:

Corona came to Los Angeles to study at USC, where he went to work and was caught up in the labor ferment of the late 1930s. He became president of Local 26 of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, and a political ally of Harry Bridges, one of U.S. labor’s most progressive and democratic leaders.

After Corona was fired from ILWU position union over an internal dispute, Harry Bridges, also a major figure within the communist dominated Congress of Industrial Organisations , offered Corona a job as a CIO organizer.

Harry Bridges also reportedly helped another leading Communist Party member with his career, Chicago based writer Frank Marshall Davis.

Frank Marshall Davis

According to Davis’ autobiography, his 1948 move to Hawaii was recommended by singer/activist Paul Robeson (also a secret Communist Party member) and Harry Bridges. Davis met Bridges at Chicago’s communist run Abraham Lincoln School, where Bridges recommended that he contact communist Koji Ariyoshi, editor of the union backed Honolulu Record. Davis subsequently worked for the paper for several years.

Circa 1970, Davis would meet, and go on mentor for several years, the young Barack Obama.

As late as 1973, Davis also served as a sponsor of the well known Communist Party front American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born (which mounted major campaigns to save Australian born Harry Bridges from deportation), alongside well known California communist and former Democratic Party Congressman, Hugh DeLacy.

ACFPOFB letterhead, April 12, 1973

In 1967, DeLacy was involved in supporting Cesar Chavez. In a letter of gratitude to Hugh DeLacy, Chavez wrote “Jack Berman told me of all the hard work done by the committee members to insure the success of the party… your generosity on behalf of the Delano strikers will further the cause of social justice…”

Ten years later, DeLacy had formed a long lasting and close relationship to a young California Congressman named Leon Panetta, himself very close to Democratic Socialists of America – who was recently appointed by Barack Obama as U.S. Secretary of Defense.

In the late 1990s, Southern California Communist Party leader Evelina Alarcon and the United Farm Workers union, began agitating to make Cesar Chavez’s birthday a California public holiday.

Evelina Alarcon

Alarcon enlisted the support of Dolores Huerta and her brother, then Democratic Majority leader of the California State Senate, Richard Alarcon, who introduced Senate Bill 984, which would make March 31, Chavez’s birthday a paid public holiday.

That campaign succeeded, so Evelina Alarcon and the Communist Party launched the Cesar E. Chavez National Holiday campaign to lobby for the holiday on a national basis. Endorsers of the campaign included Dolores Huerta and Antonio Villaraigosa.

Now her website proudly proclaims Barack Obama’s personal endorsement of the idea.

In June 2008, Evelina Alarcon presented a poster from the organization to Barack Obama’s younger sister Maya Soetoro-Ng at a gathering in East Los Angeles.

Evelina Alarcon, left, Maya Soetoro-Ng, right

According to the LA Progressive:

Addressing a largely Latino audience in East Los Angeles yesterday, Dr. Maya Soetoro-Ng shared stories about her childhood with her older brother, Barack Obama, and the effect he has had on her life. Held in El Sereno’s Hecho en Mexico restaurant, the event drew more than a hundred enthusiastic community activists, local elected officials, and regular citizens…

Evelina Alarcon, a notable Obama supporter and the sister of long-time Los Angeles politician Richard Alarcon, presented a poster to Obama’s sister commemorating the life of Cesar Chavez.

Alarcon recounted the accomplishments of the late Chicano leader and argued persuasively for honoring his accomplishments with a national holiday. Reminding those in attendance that Barack Obama supports the call to make Cesar Chavez’s birthday a national holiday. Alarcon trusts that if Obama is elected president the holiday will become a reality.

Like Cesar Chavez, Barack Obama was made into an icon by an unholy alliance of communists, socialists and Alinskyites.

Cesar Chavez didn’t make a movement, a movement made Cesar Chavez. The same movement “made” Barack Obama – and Richard Alarcon, Antonio Villaraigoas, even Leon Panetta.

By honoring Dolores Huerta, Barack Obama was just showing a little gratitude.

Order Trevor Loudon's new book: 'Barack Obama and the Enemies Within'

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

‘An Outstanding Lack of Understanding’: Mexico Launching Probe into Fast and Furious

Via: The Blaze

During a forum Thursday on Capitol Hill, the Mexican Ambassador to the United States announced his country was conducting its own investigation into the disastrous federal gun-walking operation known as Fast and Furious, The Los Angeles Times reports.

Arturo Sarukhan said Mexican officials were kept out of the loop during the program, which saw around 2,000 U.S. purchased firearms walked across the border only to fall into the hands of drug cartels. The guns are believed to have been used in the killings of hundreds of people in Mexico, including U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.

“Mexico was never apprised how the operation would be designed and implemented,” Sarukhan told officials at the forum hosted by the New Democrat Network (NDN) and the New Policy Institute.

Mexican Ambassador to the U.S., Arturo Sarukhan. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

“Regardless of whether this was or was not the intent or the design of Fast and Furious,” he continued, “The thinking that you can let guns walk across the border and maintain operational control of those weapons is really an outstanding lack of understanding of how these criminal organizations are operating on both sides of our common borders.”

The Mexican ambassador also said the gun walking program has “poisoned the wellsprings” of public opinion in Mexico, undermining the accomplishments of the U.S. and Mexico in fighting illegal gun trafficking.

The Los Angeles Times has more from the Capitol Hill forum:

While condemning the ATF’s gun-walking debacle, Sarukhan also tried to turn the focus to how the United States and Mexico could work together to prevent transnational gun trafficking. For Mexico, that would mean adding manpower and resources into its customs inspections and facilities at the border, he said.

“This has to be a dual process,” Sarukhan said. “We won’t achieve too much if the only ones inspecting or looking for guns are Mexican customs.”

In March, Rep.Adam B. Schiff(D-Burbank) introduced legislation that would create two-year prison sentences for “straw purchasers,” who acquire weapons to sell to Mexican gun smugglers. Currently, straw purchasers face probation or minimal jail time.

Yet he worries that Republicans may oppose the legislation in order to keep the focus on the Fast and Furious debacle.

The Justice Department‘s inspector general is doing an investigation, and members on both sides of the aisle agree that we need to get the facts,” Schiff said. “What I don’t want is the continual use of this investigation for political purposes that distract us from the need to curb the problem at hand and focus on solutions.”

Operation Fast and Furious was run by the Phoenix office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and let illegal guns purchased in Arizona cross the Mexican border with the intention of tracking the guns back to drug cartel leaders. But nearly 1,700 guns were lost and weren’t found until they started showing up at crime scenes throughout Mexico.

An ATF study revealed that 68,000 of 99,000 guns confiscated by law enforcement agencies in Mexico could be traced to the U.S, according to the LA Times.

Attorney General Eric Holder prior to testifying before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing entitled, "Fast & Furious: Management Failures at the Department of Justice". (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has been routinely criticized for his handling of Fast and Furious and for providing conflicting statements concerning when he was first made aware of the operation.

In another development, ATF documents obtained by CBS News in December revealed the agency had also discussed using Fast and Furious to make the case for new rules about gun sales in the United States. Read more from the report:

ATF officials didn’t intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales, including sales encouraged by ATF, to justify a new gun regulation called “Demand Letter 3”. That would require some U.S. gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or “long guns.” Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.

On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF’s Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

“Bill – can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks.”

The Obama administration has attempted to distance itself from the Fast and Furious scandal and is likely the last thing they want brought up during an election year.

Meanwhile, House Speaker John Boehner and GOP leadership are presently applying additional pressure to Holder and the Justice Department in trying to enforce a congressional subpoena of documents relating to the operation.

“We write to express our concerns with the lack of full cooperation from the Department of Justice with the ongoing Congressional investigation into the operation known as ‘Fast & Furious’ and the related death of Border Agent Brian Terry,” House leaders wrote to Holder.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Unreal: Holder Demands Florida Halt Purge of Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls…

Via: Zip. Wait, isn’t Holder supposed to enforce the laws?

Via Miami Herald:

The Justice Department ordered Florida’s elections division to halt a systematic effort to find and purge the state’s voter rolls of noncitizen voters.

Florida’s effort appears to violate both the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which protects minorities, and the 1993 National Voter Registration Act — which governs voter purges — T. Christian Herren Jr., the Justice Department’s lead civil rights lawyer, wrote in a detailed two-page letter sent late Thursday night.

State officials said they were reviewing the letter. But they indicated they might fight DOJ over its interpretation of federal law and expressed frustration that President Barack Obama’s administration has stonewalled the state’s noncitizen voter hunt for nine months.

“We are firmly committed to doing the right thing and preventing ineligible voters from being able to cast a ballot,” said Chris Cate, spokesman for Secretary of State Ken Detzner, who was ordered by Gov. Rick Scott to conduct the search for potentially ineligible voters.

DOJ’s written demand came hours after the agency refused to comment on the matter to The Miami Herald. It also followed a federal court ruling Thursday that struck down a Republican voter-registration law that a judge found too onerous.

Keep reading…

HT: Billy Ray Valentine

Enhanced by Zemanta

Rage Inducing: Obama Rejected Poland’s Request To Have Anti-Communist Solidarity Hero Lech Walesa Receive Medal of Freedom On Behalf of Jan Karski…

Via: Zip

Their excuse, he was “too political,” yet Obama had no problem putting a medal around the neck of the Democratic Socialists of America chairwoman, Dolores Huerta.

Via National Review:

Lech Walesa was once a trade-union activist. He was often arrested for speaking his mind against Communist oppression behind the Iron Curtain in Poland and for defying the Soviet Union. He was an electrician who, with no higher education, led one of the most profound freedom movements of the 20th century — Solidarity. He became president of Poland and swept in reforms, pushing the Soviet Union out of his homeland and moving the country toward a free-market economy and individual liberty. And President Obama doesn’t want him to set foot in the White House.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Polish officials requested that Walesa accept the Medal of Freedom on behalf of Jan Karski, a member of the Polish Underground during World War II who was being honored posthumously this week. The request makes sense. Walesa and Karski shared a burning desire to rid Poland of tyrannical subjugation. But President Obama said no.

Administration officials told the Journal that Walesa is too “political.” A man who was arrested by Soviet officials for dissenting against the government for being “political” is being shunned by the United States of America for the same reason 30 years later.

Meanwhile, one of the recipients of the Medal was Dolores Huerta, the honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America. So socialist politics are acceptable, but not the politics of a man who stood up and fought socialism.

Keep reading…

Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama’s Memorial Day Photo-Op Blocks Families, Vets From D.C. Vietnam Memorial Wall For 7 Hours

Via:

On Memorial Day, the Vietnam Memorial in D.C. is supposed to look like this:

Instead, for seven long hours, it looked like this:

Obama’s secret service shut down the memorial for most of the day, as families and veterans who had come to pay their respects to fallen loved ones were forced to stay hundreds of feet away.

Why?  So that the Narcissist-in-Chief could show up for 15-minute speech and photo-op with his carefully selected fans in the audience.

In his campaign speech remarks, Obama made sure to mention that:

“As long as I’m president, we will make sure you and your loved ones will receive the benefits you’ve earned and the respect you deserve,” Obama said. “America will be there for you.”

Wow.  How did our veterans ever get their benefits before the benevolent Obamessiah came to office?   Is that his argument for why they should vote for him?  Because their benefits are only available “as long as I’m president?”  Perhaps he’s hoping they’ll forget that he suspended hazard pay for deployed U.S. troopsterminated 157 Air Force Majors without retirement benefits, and proposed a budget that would cut healthcare benefits for active duty and retired US military while protecting union benefits.

Brian Trubee left this comment on Weasel Zippers:

I just received this e-mail from a brother in arms who I served with as a USAF pararecueman. A link to his e-mail is at the bottom of the message. I deleted the photos because the server rejected them. -Brian Trubee, Redmond, Washington.:

I am currently in Washington DC and witnessed the following. I saw this first hand and I bet you won’t hear about this from the Liberal media…

Vietnam veterans and the families of Vietnam veterans killed in action whose names are etched on the Wall were denied access to their memorial today, of all days, Memorial Day. The Vietnam Memorial was shutdown, cleared and secured for approximately 5 hours prior to Obama, his cronies and hand picked veterans for a 15 minute appearance by Obama. It’s obvious it was all for show. After all, this is an election year.

Hundreds if not thousands of Vietnam veterans and families of Vietnam veterans killed in Vietnam stood in disbelief as Secret Service, Park Police, Washington DC Police, etc., blocked all access to the Vietnam Memorial and kept everyone approximately 100 yards away from their memorial for the first time in the history of the Memorial so Obama could get some photos of him at the Wall. Veterans in uniforms stood in the heat angered as Obama makes them wait. It was a photo op at their expense and families of those killed in Vietnam.

As I stated, I was there and witnessed all of this. Many veterans and others flipped Obama the finger as his motorcade drove past. I didn’t honor him with a finger salute because I was busy holding up my 3′x5′ Don’t Tread on Me Flag as his motorcade drove past.

On another note, I was able to dedicate some port-o potties to Jane Fonda. Pictures attached. Maybe Obama should share this honor with Jane Fonda henceforth.

- Jim Morris

Kristinn at Free Republic confirms the story:

So this is how Obozo honors those who served….I just had this passed on from a friend who was at the wall this morning:

I normally try to avoid political statements, but this one is a bit different. This was received by Colonel Wayne Morris just a few moments ago, who was refused access to the Vietnam War Memorial, where he has visited his fallen comrades for the last 15 years.

Today is Memorial Day and I went to the Vietnam Memorial and something happened there that upset me greatly and I want to pass it on.

For over 15 years I had been going with my dear Marine buddy, Larry Cullen. Since he passed away last year and was interned at Arlington Cemetery, I went this year accompanied by my grandson, Cameron. I had my list of Recon Marines, school classmates, and Larry’s fallen buddies to visit but, as we got close to the area of the National Mall where the Wall is located, we saw huge white tents. We also saw barricades all along Constitution Ave and for a couple blocks in each direction from the Wall. They even closed down all of Constitution Av from the Lincoln Memorial all the way to the WW-II Memorial and there was a virtual army of uniformed and plain-clothes security everywhere.

The biggest tent was right at the west end of the Wall entrance and there was a covered walkway leading right up to The Wall. It was so close, you couldn’t get to the Wall on that side so, my grandson and I went all the way around to the eastern entrance to the Wall and walked down along the Wall to the first of my names and I began telling my grandson about my buddies and how each one died. In short order, a guy in a dark suit and earpiece in his ear told us we had to leave as it was 0730 and they were closing Memorial until at least 1400 so the President could drop by. I asked if he was serious and he assured me he was. We and all the other veterans and families were forced to leave and it was locked down.

The Vietnam Memorial is the most visited site on the entire National Mall. Memorial Day has more visitors to the Vietnam Memorial than almost any other day. Even at the rather early hour Cameron and I were there, there were a lot of veterans and family members down there. In the midst of all that, Obama decides to close it for over seven hours just so he can roll by for 30 minutes in the afternoon for a campaign appearance with Democrats, supporters, and campaign donors? This is an incredulously arrogant, egotistical, and inconsiderate thing to do. What in hell was Obama thinking?

Hey President Obama: Since you ran me (and all the other veterans and family members) out of the Memorial before we finished our business there, how about doing me a favor. If you can take a short break from all the grippin’, grinnin’, posin’ and pontificatin’, how about taking a minute or two to stop by and say hello to my fellow Recon Marines and other classmates on the Wall. I suspect you’ll be too busy with photo ops, campaigning, and stroking donors to be troubled with a couple minutes doing what the Memorial was built for but, just in case, here’s a list so you can have your man find them and point them out to you. Hope you have a Meaningful Memorial Day.

Joseph J. JONES; 53-W-02
Sherwood David Kreis, 42-W-40
Dale Kagebein, 34-W-50
Jerry Bock, 25-W-95
Larry Daniels, 09-E- 66
Joe Mack Kemp, 09-E-69
Rhonda L. Raglan, 09-E-70
Robert L. Studards, 09-E-71
Jose D. Flores, 09-E-74
Arthur Willie Greene, 14-E-56
Eric Barnes, 17-E-41
Godfried Blankenship, 17-E-48
Michael Ray Smith, 19-E-113
Ervin Lovell, 19-E-120
William D. Martin, 25-E- 87
Michael L. Laporte, 26-E-1
Ronald Frederick Kitzke, 32-E-76
Charles Harris, 34-E-48
Robert Tracy, 34-E-72
Michael G. Murdock, 36-E-57

Maybe it would have been better for everyone if Obama had just gone golfing like last year.   Unfortunately, this is what veterans and their families have to suffer when Obama is in full campaign mode.

No wonder a recent Gallup poll showed veterans prefer Mitt Romney to Obama, 58% to 34%.

H/T Jan Weeks

Cross posted at ThoughtsFromAConservativeMom.com

Obama’s dismal track record with our military

Enhanced by Zemanta

Democrats See “Blacks” as “Useful Idiots”

Via: Frantz Kebreau

Most Americans believe that the political parties switched shortly after the Civil Rights Act of 1964-The Landmark Anti-Discrimination Law. As the story goes, the Democrats became Republicans in protest of their party apparently supporting Civil Rights for �Blacks�. In truth, the vote count for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was 80% Republican support to 63% Democratic Party support. So either the Democrats who did not support this Law left the Democratic Party or their constituents stopped voting for Democrats and elected Republicans. Politics is about Power and Power only comes from the votes cast by your power base. Let�s see how it turned out.

Enhanced by Zemanta

IT’S THE CULTURE, STUPID

Exclusive: Tom Tancredo asserts election is about worldview clash, not economics

There is a growing realization in political quarters that there’s more to the resiliency of the Obama regime and his re-election chances than voters’ shifting priorities or occasional upticks in the nation’s economy. But the resiliency of the Obama constituency should not be a mystery: It’s the culture, stupid. Some very large segments of the population are immune from any evidence or real-world news of Obama’s failures. The challenge for Republican strategists and Romney advisers is that this problem is far deeper than traditional Democratic constituencies such as organized labor and ethnic minorities. The problem for Republican strategists is that they have great difficulty thinking outside the box of conventional economic issues. They fear “social issues” – which are, of course, cultural issues – and have no contingency plan for dealing with them.

The bad news for Romney is that at least 40 percent of the electorate shares much of Obama’s worldview; their support for Obama does not depend on the direction of the monthly unemployment numbers. That’s not a weak base to build on, and the Republican task of finding 51 percent who will resist the free-lunch demagoguery of the left grows more difficult with each election cycle.

The Obama worldview is radically different from any traditional policy framework rooted in limited government and the rule of law. The Obama worldview provides an instant translation for any event that might be seen by ordinary citizens as a policy failure. To Obama and the radical left, when an Obama policy gets disappointing results, it’s because American institutions have failed. To them, that means they must redouble their efforts, not change course. To Obama’s legion of admirers and clients, America’s problems are rooted in our nation’s sins and our “large moral deficit.” Our problems run so deep, they could not possibly be overcome in four short years. So, don’t blame Obama if we haven’t yet turned the corner to prosperity and universal peace and happiness. “Keep the faith, baby.” The best example of the political intersection of Obama’s radical worldview and conventional economic policy is in his tax proposals. Obama believes that the fundamental question about our tax system is not how we generate enough revenue to finance the legitimate functions of government. That is the way Republicans like to frame the issue. But to Obama, that misses the mark. To Obama and his cultural warriors, the paramount question about tax policy is “fairness.” Rich people have more money to spend than poor people, and that is not fair. Government must redress that “inequality” through progressive taxation. What Republicans – and libertarians generally – do not understand is that this debate over “fairness” is not a debate about economic principles or markets. It is an argument over moral principles. Why is it more “fair” to take 90 percent of one’s man’s honest earnings and only 10 percent of another’s? The answer to that question depends on your moral philosophy, not your vocation or your ancestry. This war is not new. The culture of individualism and the culture of collectivism have been at war for over a century. That war has been waged since at least 1848, the year Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, and it has been intensifying since the Progressive Era. The political slogans of the progressives have always been variations of the “fairness” theme, and Obama is tapping into that progressive tradition with renewed vigor. The immediate problem for Romney and the Republican Party is that after a century or more of brainwashing by progressives in our public schools and universities, entire subcultures in the worlds of education, foundations, arts and entertainment, and public employees share the progressive worldview and its concept of “fairness.” In that culture, “class warfare” is not a campaign tactic, it’s a permanent fixture. Republicans have been inept in dealing with this cultural guerrilla war because they have been slow to see it for what it is. Obama’s program is a challenge to the core principles and values that support the pillars of constitutional liberty. It’s not a debate about “four more years.” It’s a contest for America’s soul. Once the true scope and pervasive character of this war is understood, no one can seriously propose to limit the battlefield to economic issues alone – and efforts to do so are doomed. The 2012 election is not referendum on the economy. It is referendum on Obama and his radical vision of a different, “transformed” America, an America that will look a lot more like modern Greece or France than any America dreamed of by our forefathers. Winning this debate requires a vigorous defense of “American exceptionalism,” which is a fancy way of saying we have to defend the uniqueness of America as an exception to the misery and perennial despotism of other continents. The history of leftism in Europe and elsewhere is a history of broken promises and creeping totalitarianism. The left always demands more state power to fix the mess created by its own failures. But the cultural war thrust on us by Obama’s radicalism is also a war encompassing more than one election. To turn America from that downward path will require not only a rejection of Obama in 2012 but also a refurbishing and strengthening of traditional American values across a wide spectrum of institutions. If the Republican Party is not up to that arduous task, then a successor party will surely rise to the challenge.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Hezbollah Terrorists Working with Mexican Drug Cartels

It’s not IF Hezbollah operatives have been smuggled into the U.S…but how many? ” We’ve been posting articles for months showing that terrorist groups had crossed our border, despite denials by DHS. Now new evidence shows that Hezbollah is allied with Mexican cartels, helping them to improve their smuggling operations, and using their tunnels to enter the U.S. What’s the Admin’s solution? No border wall, and amnesty for illegals. 2012 can’t come soon enough.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Don’t Look Now, But… John Wolfe Is About Ready to Steal the Lead From Obama in Arkansas Democrat Primary Election

 When the vote tallies started coming in earlier tonight President Barack Obama led Democrat opponent John Wolfe 80% to 20%. But that has all changed now. With 4 of 75 counties reporting John Wolfe has 35% of the vote against fellow Democrat and former community organizer, Barack Obama.

He doesn’t quite have the star power of Keith Judd, but John Wolfe will do.
Democrat presidential candidate John Wolfe, Jr. spoke with a citizen journalist recently on his campaign strategy to defeat fellow Democrat Barack Obama.

The night is young. There is still hope for John Wolfe. Stay tuned.

UPDATE: (9:00 CST) Wolfe now has 37% of the vote. Obama at 62%.

Enhanced by Zemanta

JOE WILSON WAS RIGHT

Tom Tancredo asserts, to Obama the socialist, lies are necessary and noble

In September of 2009, Rep. Joe Wilson interrupted a speech to Congress by President Obama with the words, “You lie!” At the time Wilson was widely criticized for his impolite violation of decorum, but now we know he was our Paul Revere for Obama’s barrage of lies. Obama’s lies about his health-care proposal became famous after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was enacted into law in March of 2010. The lies and misleading promises made to the American people about nearly every aspect of Obamacare can fill a book. “Lower costs”? Nope. No rationing or “death panels”? Think again. “You can keep your own doctor if you choose.” Not true. There will be exemptions and waivers for churches and religious organizations? No. “It will pay for itself in savings.” Not according to the Congressional Budget Office. Those Obamacare lies are now so widely known they have become part of our political folklore. But they are only the tip of the iceberg. In talking about Obama’s lies, we should distinguish them from the ordinary political exaggerations and evasions common among candidates and government officials. The sugarcoating or denial of unpleasant facts by is now taken for granted in democratic societies. We also have grown weary of clichés and slogans that at root are lies. “Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme and is not going broke.” “Foreign aid is not bribery to buy goodwill.” “The United Nations is not corrupt.” “Higher tax rates do not affect economic behavior.” “Our national debt is nothing to worry about.” Such lies contribute to a growing cynicism about politics and politicians. How are Obama’s lies different? They are lies meant to disguise a systematic and sustained socialist assault on the Constitution. They are not random; they are a necessary and integral part of his program to “transform America.” Earlier generations of politicians would be embarrassed by Obama’s chutzpah, but in the regime of this “first president of the post-American world,” lying is clearly the preferred means of persuasion. Under his leadership and following his example, his Cabinet officers lie to the public almost daily. At Obama’s instruction, Eric Holder has lied to congressional committees about his knowledge of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-running program that delivered 2,000 guns to Mexican drug cartels. Janet Napolitano repeats and elaborates on Obama’s lies about the state of border security by manipulating the number of apprehensions on the southwest border. Ken Salazar lies about the panel of experts who supposedly “recommended” a moratorium on offshore oil drilling. Hillary Clinton lies about our incoherent and catastrophic acquiescence in Iran’s nuclear program. The lies pouring out of the Obama White House have become so routine and commonplace that it is impossible to imagine an Obama speech or major policy initiative that is not wrapped in lies. A year ago, in order to defuse the fight over raising the debt ceiling, Obama promised to join Congress in bringing deficit spending under control. So what does his proposed budget for the 2012-2013 fiscal year offer? Another trillion dollar deficit! But wait: He will raise taxes, but not on you and me, only on “millionaires and billionaires.” But hold on – his tax increases actually affect anyone making over $250,000 and millions of small businesses. The truth is he cares not one whit about the deficit or the size of the national debt. Last week Obama told another outright lie, that his position on same-sex marriage has “evolved.” He says he now supports it, whereas in the past, he opposed it. The truth is that his support for same-sex marriage goes back nearly two decades. Then, just this week, another biographical lie was revealed. A 1991 biographical sketch used to promote Obama as an author stated that he was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.” The pamphlet was circulated for a decade and never repudiated until now – and the Kenya claim appeared on his agent’s website until 2007. The writer who prepared the pamphlet now says she made a “fact-check error.” The real question on the pamphlet is not the truth or falsehood of the Kenyan birth, but this: If Obama was willing to lie about where he was born to enhance his appeal, what won’t he lie about? The sad but revealing fact is that Obama’s frequent and instinctual use of lies to advance his career has its origins in his own autobiography: It’s part of who he is. For example, he cannot even write or speak about his Kenyan-born father without lying about him. Obama has claimed to be descended from Africans of humble origins, yet his father, like so many Third World radical intellectuals, including Castro and China’s communist revolutionary leaders, came from a wealthy family. Obama’s whole career has been a bundle of lies and inventions, so how can he ever abandon lying to explain, defend and perpetuate those fictions? Yet, Obama’s success could only have been possible with the help of two forces: First, the powerful influence of his ideological allies in the liberal news media and the celebrity-academic power elite. The elite media, Hollywood and academia have adopted a transparent and sickening double standard in supporting and defending Obama. But equally important, we need to understand and acknowledge that Obama is inspired and energized by his visions of radical “change.” Recall that Vladimir Lenin advocated robbing banks to finance the communist revolution in Russia. Likewise, Obama’s friend and Chicago neighbor, William Ayers, advocated killing police and also wealthy parents. To Obama, as with any self-appointed revolutionary, lies are often necessary for the advancement of the global socialist agenda. As such, they are not only moral, they are noble. Time is short to put an end to the Obama lies broadcast from the White House, lies told in service to his radical plans and visions. A man is entitled to his dreams and delusions, but not at the expense of American liberty.

Enhanced by Zemanta