All posts in Eligibility

Arizona Sheriff: Obama Birth Certificate Forged

video platform
video management
video solutions
video player

Sheriff Arpaio presents results of volunteer “cold-case posse” investigation.

How does Barrack Hussein Obama II, who refuses to appear, avoids a default judgement

Judge Malihi

SUBJECT: BREAKING: GEORGIA JUDGE MALIHI RULES THAT OBAMA AND ANYONE BORN IN THE U.S. IS NOW ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT (NATURAL BORN CITIZEN)

La Raza, Mexico, and Islamic extremists are celebrating tonight. 15 million illegal alien anchor babies born in the U.S. to illegal alien foreign parents over the past 30 years are now eligible to lead the U.S. when they reach the age of 35. New World Order/one world government here we come! Our founders are rolling in their graves.

Read the judge’s 10-page ruling here:

You can read the post here.

By John Sampson, Expert Witness in Powell, Swensson and Allen vs Obama

Eliminate all of the facts of the case, to include all of the documents,
the testimony of the witnesses, myself included. Eliminate the Supreme Court decision in Minor v. Happerset. Eliminate the entire hearing itself.

All that is left is that Barrack Hussein Obama II and Michael Jablonski failed to appear, no, make that REFUSED to appear, in court.

Having done that, can someone please explain to me how a party to a lawsuit who REFUSES to appear, AND THEIR ATTORNEY REFUSES TO APPEAR, manages to avoid a default judgment, avoids being cited for contempt even though there was a pending motion to do just that,  AND not only that, WINS and prevails. How does that work under our system of jurisprudence? It wouldn’t in any other case in any other court in the entire United States.

The GA election law requires that the CANDIDATE show that they are eligible to hold the office they are seeking. It is NOT the Plaintiff’s burden, but rather, the burden of the CANDIDATE. So how did he show that he’s eligible when he didn’t show in court, his lawyer didn’t show, he didn’t put on a single witness, didn’t submit a single document, didn’t raise a single argument?

I leave it to the people to draw their own conclusions and answer these
questions on their own. Some would say that it’s blatantly obvious.”

An appeal needs to be filed based on that single issue alone. Will it be
filed? Only time will tell.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Subject: BREAKING: Georgia Judge Malihi rules that Obama and Anyone born in the U.S. is now eligible to be President and Vice President (natural born citizen)

La Raza, Mexico, and Islamic extremists are celebrating tonight.  15 million illegal alien anchor babies born in the U.S. to illegal alien foreign parents over the past 30 years are now eligible to lead the U.S. when they reach the age of 35.  New World Order/one world government here we come!  Our founders are rolling in their graves.

Read the judge’s 10-page ruling here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/80417613/Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell-v-Obama-Judge-Malihi-Final-Decision-Georgia-Ballot-Challenge-2-3-2012

Judge: Obama eligible to be Georgia candidate

Via: ACJ

Susan Walsh, APA Georgia judge rejected a "birther" challenge that claimed President Barack Obama was ineligible for the Georgia ballot.

President Barack Obama’s name will remain on the Georgia primary ballot after a state law judge flatly rejected legal challenges that contend he can not be a candidate.

In a 10-page order, Judge Michael Malihi dismissed one challenge that contended Obama has a computer-generated Hawaiian birth certificate, a fraudulent Social Security number and invalid U.S. identification papers. He also turned back another that claimed the president is ineligible to be a candidate because his father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth.

The findings by Malihi, a judge for the State Office of Administrative Hearings, go to Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who will make the final determination. Last month, at a hearing boycotted by Obama’s lawyer, Malihi considered complaints brought by members of the so-called “birther” movement.

With regard to the challenge that Obama does not have legitimate birth and identification papers, Malihi said he found the evidence “unsatisfactory” and “insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations.”

A number of the witnesses who testified about the alleged fraud were never qualified as experts in birth records, forged documents and document manipulation and “none … provided persuasive testimony,” Malihi wrote.

Addressing the other claim that contends Obama cannot be a candidate because his father was never a U.S. citizen, Malihi said he was persuaded by a 2009 ruling by the Indiana Court of Appeals decision that struck down a similar challenge. In that ruling, the Indiana court found that children born within the U.S. are natural-born citizens, regardless of the citizenry of their parents.

Obama “became a citizen at birth and is a natural-born citizen,” Malihi wrote. Accordingly, Obama is eligible as a candidate for the upcoming presidential primary in March, the judge said.

Even though Malihi ruled in Obama’s favor, he expressed displeasure that the president’s lawyer, Michael Jablonski of Atlanta, refused to attend the recent hearing.

“By deciding this matter on the merits, the court in no way condones the conduct or legal scholarship of defendant’s attorney, Mr. Jablonski,” Malihi wrote. “This decision is entirely based on the law, as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing.”

More info on Constitutional requirements for Prez/VP:

http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Enhanced by Zemanta

Judge Malihi Rules Against Plaintiffs: Says Obama Born In Hawaii Therefore Natural Born Citizen

We just spoke with plaintiff Kevin Powell and he reports Judge Malihi has ruled against the Plaintiffs and stated in his order that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore Obama is a natural born Citizen.

Updates and Judge Malihi’s order will be provided shortly….

UPDATE: Judge Malihi’s Order now posted below……

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with this GA ballot challenge.

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Farrar/Welden/Swensson/Powell v Obama – Judge Malihi Final Decision – Georgia Ballot Challenge – 2/3/2012

Enhanced by Zemanta