All posts in Right to Life

Vatican: Supporters of Euthanasia and Abortion Use Same Arguments as the Nazis

Right to Life protesters greet Nancy Pelosi who is rated 100% on abortion by NARAL.

Vatican newspaper argues that today’s supporters of euthanasia and abortion use the same arguments as the Nazis decades ago. The Daily Mail reported:

The Vatican’s semi-official newspaper has angered supporters of euthanasia and abortions by suggesting they apply the same justifications that were used by the Nazis to champion their murderous eugenics programme. The controversial claim that they believe in the survival of the fittest concept, was made in an article on the front page of today’s issue of L’Osservatore RomanO. It was published in response to the recent Italian translation of a 1920 book titled Allowing the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Living, by two German scholars, Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche. It is written by Lucetta Scaraffia, an Italian historian who frequently has work published in the Vatican paper, reports the Huffington Post. ‘Contempt for imperfect human life, over estimation of the abilities of science’ are ‘still firmly present in our time,’ she states. The book she is discussing set the agenda for the Nazi programme of extermination – they believed that select people did not have the right to survive, such as disabled or terminally ill patients. It promotes the idea that people who are seriously or terminally ill or have a mental or physical disability were ‘unworthy of being lived,’ and should be given a ‘charitable death.’ In the article Scaraffia argues that this viewpoint on whether a life should be ended is present in the ‘writings of many contemporary bioethicists, and of many politicians who support legislative proposals of a euthanastic type.’ The historian asserts that the book is ‘sinisterly’ relevant to current debates.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Baby “Tebowing” on Ultrasound

After the Broncos won the Steelers in the playoffs…We went in for a ultrasound to find out the gender of our baby. This is the 4d photo that captured our baby BOY!!! “Tebowing” baby is due in May 2012 Our little Champ!

American Thinker: Tebow, Palin, and the Pain of Remorse (Update: Broncos Win in OT)

Conservatives For Palin

Tim Tebow has been called the Palin of the NFL. He certainly generates strong emotions whenever his name is mentioned, just like the Guv. (He also sells a lot of jerseys and merchandise … ”just like the Guv.) I’ve enjoyed watching Tebow defy his critics by powering the Broncos to a 4-1 record since he took over the starting job five weeks ago.

Here’s a Sunday palate cleanser courtesy of Jeannie DeAngelis at American Thinker:

Tim Tebow is really annoying to certain people in a Sarah Palin sort of way.  Whenever Tim or Sarah shows up, an uncomfortable feeling accompanies him or her, and it’s called conviction.  One definition for “convict” is “to impress with a sense of guilt.”  That is precisely what Tim Tebow and Sarah Palin are guilty of: impressing shame and remorse upon America that it would prefer to avoid.

The Palin family has been mocked and derided for many reasons, including baby boy Trig, born with Down Syndrome.  This past spring, after former Gov. Palin posted a birthday tribute to her son, former Wonkette writer Jack Stuef called Trig a “magic intellectually disabled baby prop.”  Stuef questioned “Trig’s parentage, implying he was conceived in incest, and used the R word.”

Stuef has since apologized and said he regretted using the word “retarded,” but he stands by his criticism of Palin.

By approving of and promoting policies that destroy innocent human life, the left is hateful enough.  However, when a conservative public figure “chooses” life, what emanates from hate-spewing liberals amounts to a new level of vitriol.

That rage is evidenced by liberal reactions to Sarah Palin, who celebrates the life of a child whom some liberals would deem a disposable burden on society.  Palin said it so well in a 2011 Thanksgiving tribute to Trig when she shared:

Through Trig, I see firsthand that there is man’s standard of perfection, and then there is God’s.  Man’s standard is flawed, temporary, and shallow.  God’s standard lasts an eternity.  At the end of the day, His is what matters.

And what about that pesky Tim Tebow?  In 1987, Tim’s mother Pam chose to grant her son the gift of life.  Pregnant and suffering from a life-threatening infection, Pam Tebow, a missionary with her husband Robert to the Philippines, was told that her and Robert’s child would be stillborn.  Rather than take the advice of her doctor and abort, Pam Tebow chose to trust God.

Both mother and baby survived, and today, much like Sarah and Trig Palin, Pam and Tim Tebow both pose a problematic contradiction to one of thestrongest arguments abortion advocates use when arguing to justify disposing of the unborn.

To this day, 24 years after proving the doctor wrong, starting quarterback for the Denver Broncos Tim Tebow remains downright annoying.  Every time he makes an appearance on the football field, without opening his mouth, the abortion survivor takes all the fun out of the sport.  Why?  Because pro-choice America is forced to look into the face of a strapping miracle child whose mother put his life ahead of her own.

To make matters worse, not only did the Tebow family allow the child to be born, but they then did the unthinkable and raised him to
be a devout Christian.

[...]

Based on the left’s reaction, seems Trig Palin and Tim Tebow are huge thorns in the side of pro-choice America.  So are their mothers, who, if they’d only exercised the right to choose, would have made life a lot more comfortable for those who would rather avoid dredging up past mistakes.

Read the whole thing here …

Update: It’s Tebow Time. The Broncos are driving late in the 4th quarter against San Diego with a chance to tie or take the lead.

Update II: Broncos win in OT. 16-13. Tebow is now 5-1, and has the Broncos in the hunt for the AFC West lead.

Enhanced by Zemanta