Those seven words should have sent the message loud and clear to the Obama administration that they are in for a tough, and potentially embarrassing fight against Arizona’s famously tough Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Arpaio, who has attained the status of folk hero among the pro-border enforcement crowd, appeared on the Mike Broomhead show today in his first interview since being officially served with a suit by the Obama administration’s Justice Department.
Arpario was, predictably, entirely un-intimidated, condescendingly remarking that “it’s a political year” as his explanation for why the administration was choosing to target him at this particular moment. His braggadocio only increased from there, as Arpaio crowed, “Take me to Court! I love going to Court!”
Broomhead noted that even Arpaio’s detractors were asking for proof of the accusations against him. Arpaio responded that nothing had come out because there was no proof, and in point of fact, he was negotiating.
“It’s the election year. Go after the Sheriff. All these local activists like Will Cox have been ganging up with the ACLU and the Justice Department hoping that I’ll resign,” Arpaio scoffed. “But I’m not going to resign.”
Broomhead did ask Arpaio how much longer he thought he’d be effective at his job. Arpaio didn’t answer, but said there was no chance he’d resign for “personal reasons” no matter how much the activists arrayed against him wanted him to.
“They can do all they want with all those demonstrators calling me a Nazi, Hitler, every name in the book, they’re worried because I say one word, and they go crazy,” he said. “It’s all a game plan to get rid of this Sheriff.”
Arpaio brushed off accusations about his methods, saying his opponents just didn’t like that he was doing a good job enforcing the illegal immigration laws. “They don’t like it. They don‘t like this high profile Sheriff that’s not gonna back down,” he said.
And based on the rest of the interview, Arpaio can be trusted to stick to his word on that. From sneering about the “beer summit” to offering to take on President Obama on the basketball court, Arpaio showed complete, unflappable calm. This fight is not likely to go well for the White House.
Sheriff Arpaio should contact The Intel Hub, considering we are giving this matter a serious look.Apparently the Sheriff just figured out the (mainstream) media is fully controlled.
PHOENIX — This could be one of the most detrimental issues the country is facing as the POTUS (President of the United States) can not even pass an e-verify check — Yet, Barrack H. Obama is in control of our nations nuclear arsenal.
Did the Sheriff bite off more than he can chew or does he have the courage to head off with the Puppet Masters that lurk behind the Vail?
We are talking about interfering with the globalists everlasting martial law measure that was implemented upon America in 2009 with help from the globalist controlled World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations (UN) bodies.
In fact the POTUS himself passed an executive order on March 16, of 2012 basically initiating silent martial law.
This order came as a follow up to keep the nation in a constant state of martial law as the currently imposed extension to Pandemic Level 6 martial law expired earlier this month.
Pandemic Level 6 martial law was extended by the POTUS after the Swine Flu Pandemic of 2009, later the following year.
We are essentially in an everlasting state of silent martial law that has been contrived by the powers that be.
When will they go hot with the agenda?
The following except was published by a local Phoenix blog:
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio believes that a media conspiracy “bigger than Watergate” is purposefully downplaying his volunteer posse’s investigation of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate.
Arpaio and the posse held an hour-long press conference earlier this month describing their belief that the online version of Obama’s long form certificate is a fake.
Arpaio began investigating at the request of the Surprise Tea Party. Its members recently listened to a speech by a writer from the anti-Obama, conspiracy theory-laden website WorldNetDaily (Which once published a six-part series of commentaries under the headline, “Soy is making kids ‘gay’”.)
“The media all came to make fun of me,” the sheriff said of his “birther” press conference. “I’m a little concerned that all of their questions were zeroed in on credibility and that this has been rehashed. They didn’t even ask about the proof of the case. They didn’t ask about the facts that we had.”
I suggested that perhaps it is because most people believe questions about the document have been answered. In addition, Hawaiian officials have verified Obama’s citizenship.
Arpaio is unconvinced.
He believes that the experts used by his volunteers are correct and, while not directly accusing officials in Hawaii, said, “You know there’s corruption everywhere. I’m not saying they’re corrupt. I’m not saying they’re lying. But we have to look into it.”
The sheriff is contemplating his next move, which he said could involve taking his findings to law enforcement officials in Hawaii or Washington, or working with local legislators.
“I’m not going to drop this,” he said. “You don’t think I did a press conference and let it die? I’ll make a decision real quick where to send the evidence we have. There are not many options. You do know this is complex. Many conflicts of interest from the White house to the Attorney General. I can go on and on.”
In my opinion the Sheriff needs to come at them hard and use the Alternative media to communicate the investigations findings to the world.
PDF: Obama Eligibility Investigation Report Released By Sheriff Joe Arpaio And Cold Case Posse Here
We’ve released the report given to the press at Sheriff Joe’s press conference today, March 1, 2012. This report details how the Cold Case Posse’s investigation led them to conclude that Barack Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate as released by the administration on Whitehouse.gov is in fact, forged. This report has been given to the representatives of various media outlets.
Suspect May Have Been Incensed by Arpaio’s Ongoing Investigation into Legitimacy of Obama’s Birth Certificate
(Phoenix, AZ) Deputies in Knoxville, Tennessee working with Maricopa County Sheriff’s deputies today served a search warrant and seized computer and other evidence from the home of Adam Eugene Cox, 33, after an investigation into an internet death threat against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio came to light in October, 2011.
Cox was arrested today and taken into custody on an unrelated warrant for assault and is being investigated as the prime suspect in the Arpaio death threat investigation.
In that threat, Cox stated Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his family would be killed.
His postings read in part: I plan to kill Arpaio first. He will be filled with a thousand bullet holes before the year is out. I promise you this. He won’t f**k with Obama. He will be buried 10 feet under and his whole family will be murdered along with him.
The suspect’s postings indicate he is an avid supporter of President Barack Obama and that Arpaio’s ongoing investigation into the legitimacy of Obama’s birth certificate may be behind the threat to kill the Sheriff. The suspect’s mother confirms her son is a fanatical supporter of Obama. According to Knox County Sheriff’s deputies, Cox has a history of assault.
Arpaio’s investigation into the Obama birth certificate question has received a fair amount of press coverage since the investigation began late last year. The case is being handled by the Sheriff’s volunteer cold case posse, made up of retired police detectives and lawyers, and at no expense to the taxpayer. Their initial findings are expected to be announced within 30 days, Arpaio says.
Arpaio says, “I will not be intimated against pursuing this investigation into Obama’s eligibility to serve as the President of the United States.”
The arrest of Cox is one of numerous death threats made against Arpaio including several different Mexican drug cartels which have threatened the Sheriff’s life and placed a contract nearing $4 million dollars for his execution. Today’s arrest, however, is the first death threat involving the Obama investigation.
“Every threat will be taken seriously, and the Sheriff knows that his position often attracts threats but he draws the line when his family is threatened,” says Deputy Chief David Trombi whose detectives have overseen the threat investigations against Arpaio.
This particular threat took deputies from Arizona to California where search warrants were served on Google headquarters to Knoxville, Tennessee. At Google, deputies served a separate search warrant involving a different threat against Arpaio related to the recent shooting death of Maricopa County Sheriff’s deputy William Coleman.
A protest against Arizona’s Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Gov. Jan Brewer organized by transplanted attorney-activist Randy Parraz yielded exactly one protestor today as the state legislature met in Phoenix to begin its 2012 regular session.
“Join Citizens for a Better Arizona as we send a message to our Governor and legislators that the Russell Pearce brand of divisive and extremist politics is over,” Parraz posted on his Facebook page, calling for protestors to join him at the state capitol Monday morning. Pearce was the state Senate president and Arpaio ally on immigration recalled last year in a campaign led by Parraz.
Observers on the scene reported Parraz’s group had a permit to assemble, and some 50 Arizona State Police were there.
The lone Parraz supporter, however, was outnumbered by some 50 counter-protesters carrying signs in favor of Arpaio and Brewer, including several who identified themselves as tea party members and a Hispanic supporter of legal immigration.
Arthur Olibas, who identified himself as a “Latino legal immigrant tea party patriot,” told WND he supported Arpaio because, “He’s the only one who has the courage to enforce the laws of Arizona and the Constitution of the United States.”
WND previously reported that Parraz is a leftist political activist now living in Arizona who has made his career applying Saul Alinsky “community organizer” skills. Parraz has worked with radical leftist “progressive” movements in the United States and Canada, including staff jobs with the AFL-CIO nationally and as Arizona state director.
After ousting Pearce – who championed the passage of Arizona’s tough immigration bill, SB 1070 –Parraz has set his sites on Arpaio and Brewer, who both favor strict enforcement of Arizona and U.S. immigration laws.
Parraz is operating under the auspices of Citizens for a Better Arizona, a 501(c)4 organization that appears to be violating IRS rules by engaging in partisan political campaigns.
Parraz and his Citizens for a Better Arizona have announced their intention to pressure the upcoming Jan. 11 meeting of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to place the group’s complaints against Arpaio on the agenda. Parraz wants to advance a motion requiring the board to ask for Arpaio’s resignation.
WND has also reported Parraz and a group of ACORN activists were arrested in 2008 for disrupting a meeting of the Maricopa supervisors.
Counter-protesters supporting Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Phoenix Monday
Professional political agitator
Parraz has a protest record stretching back to his days in the 1990s as a graduate student at Harvard and a law student at the University of California at Berkeley.
The first published report WND can find documenting his political activism was a protest of about 150 students and faculties and administrators he organized as a graduate student at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, reported by the Harvard Crimson on March 9, 1994.
According to the Crimson, the rally was attended by a coalition of Kennedy School student groups, including the Black Caucus, the Latino Caucus, the Women’s Caucus and the Asian Caucus, demanding the Kennedy School meet the Department of Labor’s recommended diversity levels by hiring more women and minority faculty.
Parraz next surfaced as the president of a Latino Civil Rights Task Force, a group the Washington Post reported on Jan. 23, 1997, was created to field complaints from Latinos and promote Latino concerns to city officials in response to unrest in May 1991 by Central Americans in Mount Pleasant, a neighborhood in the District of Columbia.
Counter-protesters supporting Sheriff Joe Arpaio
The Washington Post article described Parraz as “a self-confident, articulate Mexican American labor union organizer from California.”
WND has reported Parraz, working as an AFL-CIO organizer, brought Canadian protestors through Vancouver, Canada, to participate in the 1999 protests against the World Trade Organization in Seattle in which an estimated 40,000 protesters engaged in street violence, which in protest lore was subsequently tagged as the “Battle of Seattle.”
The Orange County Register also reported on Dec. 8, 2001, that Parraz was arrested after protesters he organized to encourage national hotel chains to employ more Hispanics locally gathered in the middle of an intersection, disrupted traffic and refused to disperse as ordered by police.
Leftist blogger Bob Lord termed Parraz “a True Progressive Hero” in a DailyKos.com piece on Nov. 9, 2011, thanking Parraz for having “essentially dedicated his life to the cause [of recalling Pearce] for the better part of a year.” Parraz supported Lord’s candidacy as a Democrat for U.S. Congress in Arizona’s third congressional district.
As MCSO looks into possible tie to murdered Sedona couple, others wait to see if weapon traces back to Holder’s Operation Fast and Furious
Deputy William Coleman was shot and killed early Sunday morning while responding to a burglary in progress call. Credit: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
ANTHEM – Maricopa County Sheriff’s Deputy William Coleman, 50, was shot and killed shortly after 4 a.m. on Sunday when he and two other deputies responded to a burglary in progress call in the Anthem community.
When deputies arrived outside the Anthem Medical Plaza behind the CVS shopping center at the northwest corner of Anthem Way and Galvin Parkway, a suspect emerged from a parked minivan and began shooting at the deputies with a semiautomatic rifle.
According to Sheriff Joe Arpaio, deputies returned fire, killing the suspect, who has not yet been identified.
Arpaio said although Coleman was wearing a vest, that kind of body armor is no match for semiautomatic weapons.
Coleman, a 20-year veteran and the first MCSO deputy to be killed in the line of duty since 1995, leaves behind a wife and several children, including a 4 and 7-year-old.
The incident was still under investigation several hours later with the entire shopping center cordoned off with crime scene tape and it was unknown if anything was stolen by the suspect or if there were other suspects involved.
Deputies also rescued a pit bull that was inside the suspect’s van.
Arpaio stated, “There is a war on against police across the country. We live in a violent world.”
However, he added, “We’re pretty sure this is just an isolated incident.”
Arpaio said, “Unfortunately, one of our deputies was killed in the line of duty today. It is extremely sad for everyone. He was an excellent officer.”
MCSO is also investigating whether this incident is related to the shooting deaths of two New Hampshire visitors, whose bodies were discovered two days earlier at an overlook in Sedona on Arizona 89A in a red Subaru with the engine still running.
The victims in the Sedona incident, identified as James Johnson and Carol Raynsford, both 63, were shot with the same type of semiautomatic .223 rifle as Coleman.
Ballistics testing was scheduled for Monday to determine if the shots in both cases were actually fired from the same weapon.
Another possibility was raised in a comment on Doug Ross’ article titled, “Remember the good old days when we had real media?” posted on the blog directorblue.blogspot.com
“Duke C.” stated Attorney General Eric Holder and the U.S. Department of Justice are “holding their breath that this weapon is not connected to gunwalker’s Fast and Furious.”
His comment was later posted on the “Sipsey Street Irregulars” blog, where Mike Vanderboegh has been tirelessly covering the Fast and Furious scandal.
Vanderboegh said there were many AR-type weapons sold as part of Fast and Furious, and stated, “[I]t will be interesting to see what the trace turns up. Sheriff Joe Arpaio is not known for his love of the feds, so we shall hear presently if the weapon traces back to Eric Holder’s gunwalker conspiracy.”
Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona is investigating the murder of a deputy that some believe may be connected to the Fast and Furious scandal. Credit: (Photo by Joshua Lott/Getty Images)
Yesterday morning at 4 a.m. in Maricopa County, Arizona a veteran sheriff’s deputy was shot to death with a high-powered rifle after responding to a report of a burglary at a strip mall in Anthem, near Interstate Highway 17. Deputies at the scene say that the perpetrator came out of nowhere, sending a spray of bullets their way.
But what makes the story of potential national significance is the fact that under the surface there is talk that the gun used to kill the deputy may be a ‘Fast and Furious’ weapon that the Obama Administration placed into the hands of Mexican drug cartels in its ‘Project Gunwalker’ scheme that has now become perhaps the single biggest scandal in the history of American politics.
The story of the murder was first reported byAZCentral.com, one of the major news outlets in Arizona. However, unlike most of its stories, the news organization disabled its comment section. This led one observer to do some checking around behind the scenes.
Several key facts stand out:
1. The perpetrator could or would not be identified by law enforcement officials, although the sheriff’s office stated that an identification would be made public today after the body could be examined.
2. The deputy died in spite of the fact that he was wearing bulletproof gear.
3. Sheriff’s officials believe that the murder is tied to 2 other killings near I-17, near Sedona in Yavapai County 2 days earlier. A couple on vacation from New Hampshire was murdered with a high powered rifle similar to the one used to kill the Maricopa County deputy.
4. A reader at the Doug Ross Journal stated in the comment section that Eric Holder, the DOJ, and the ATF are ‘holding their breaths’ hoping that ballistic tests will not show that the deputy was killed with a Fast and Furious gun.
It is to be noted that the Sheriff of Maricopa County is ‘Sheriff Joe’ Arpaio, who has been at the center of an ongoing skirmish with the Obama Administration, the Justice Department, and Eric Holder over the Administration’s failure to secure the southern border. It is believed that given Sheriff Joe’s ongoing battle with the Administration, including Eric Holder’s threats to take legal action against him, the Sheriff will fully investigate the evidence and report it to the media if there is any connection whatsoever to the Gunwalker scandal.
ANTHEM – Maricopa County Sheriff’s Deputy William Coleman, 50, was shot and killed shortly after 4 a.m. on Sunday when he and two other deputies responded to a burglary in progress call in the Anthem community.
Maricopa County Sheriff's deputies cordoned off the entire commercial center at the northwest corner of Anthem Way and Gavilan Parkway so crime scene investigators could process the scene where Deputy William Coleman was slain early Sunday morning. Credit: Linda Bentley
When deputies arrived outside the Anthem Medical Plaza behind the CVS shopping center at the northwest corner of Anthem Way and Galvin Parkway, a suspect emerged from a parked minivan and began shooting at the deputies with a semiautomatic rifle.
According to Sheriff Joe Arpaio, one of the deputies returned fire and killed the suspect, who has not yet been identified.
Arpaio said although Coleman was wearing a vest, that kind of body armor is no match for semiautomatic weapons.
Coleman, a 20-year veteran and the first MCSO deputy to be killed in the line of duty since 1995, leaves behind a wife and several children, including a 4 and 7-year-old.
The incident was still under investigation several hours later with the entire shopping center cordoned off with crime scene tape and it was unknown if anything was stolen by the suspect or if there were other suspects involved.
Deputies also rescued a pit bull that was inside the suspect’s van.
Arpaio stated, “There is a war on against police across the country. We live in a violent world.”
However, he added, “We’re pretty sure this is just an isolated incident.”
Arpaio said, “Unfortunately, one of our deputies was killed in the line of duty today. It is extremely sad for everyone. He was an excellent officer.”
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers “The Obama Nation” and “Unfit for Command.” Along with serving as WND’s senior staff reporter, Corsi is a senior managing director at Gilford Securities. Gilford Securities, founded in 1979, is a full-service boutique investment firm headquartered in NYC providing financial services to institutional and retail clients, from investment banking and equity research to retirementMore ↓
Maverick Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio is challenging the Obama administration’s Department of Justice to present evidence to back its charge that his office is discriminating against Hispanics.
“Prove it,” Arpaio said in remarks directed at Holder in an interview with WND.
“If Eric Holder has evidence that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has engaged in systematic violations of the civil rights of Hispanics, then show me the evidence,” Arpaio said.
Nor was Arpaio concerned that the DOJ might take him and his sheriff’s department to federal court.
“If the Justice Department wants to take me to court, I’m ready,” Arpaio said.
Arpaio was responding to a statement emailed today to WND in which the DOJ threatened to go to court immediately rather than show Arpaio’s office and the U.S. public the evidence it claims to have.
“If MCSO wants to debate the facts instead of fixing the problems stated in our findings, we will do so by way of litigation,” DOJ said in the statement.
In the cover letter, Arpaio attorney Joseph J. Popolizio made it clear that the sheriff was willing to cooperate with Holder and the DOJ, but only if the DOJ revealed to the MCSO and the public its proof.
“Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and the MCSO are certainly interested in constructive dialogue, but constructive dialogue can only occur if the DOJ provides the facts and information on which it bases its findings,” Popolizio wrote.
Nothing more than a political attack?
Arpaio also took exception to the DOJ assertion that the federal investigation against his office began under the Bush administration.
“There may have been complaints filed with the Justice Department under the Bush administration,” Arpaio conceded, “but we were first notified in March 2009 – in the Obama administration’s first 100 days – that the Department of Justice had begun a formal investigation of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.”
Arpaio pointed out that after three years of cooperating with the Justice Department investigation, his office was given only one-hour’s advance notice that the report was going to be released.
On the morning of Dec. 15, the Justice Department called officials of the Sheriff’s office to a 9 a.m. meeting, refusing to disclose in advance the purpose of the meeting.
One hour later, at 10 a.m. local time, Perez held a press conference in Phoenix, making the Arpaio report public.
DOJ officials turned away MCSO representatives from attending the press conference, claiming the room was too full to permit additional attendees.
Arpaio questioned the timing of the press conference, noting that Dec. 15 was one day after the first anniversary of the gun battle near the Arizona border in which Border Patrol Agent Brian A. Terry was gunned down by illegal immigrants armed with weapons supplied by the Justice Department in the now controversial “Fast and Furious” gun-walking operation that has brought Holder under considerable political pressure to resign.
Clearly, winning the Latino vote is a key presidential election strategy for the Democratic Party in 2012.
On Sept. 28, Obama gave a White House interview to three Latino journalists in which he singled out Arpaio by name and declared Maricopa County should not be taken as the “model” for U.S. immigration laws.
Some observers also note the timing. The Obama administration chose to make public allegations resulting from a three-year DOJ investigation after Arpaio authorized a MCSO Cold Case Posse to investigate Obama’s birth certificate and his eligibility to be president under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
Moreover, the DOJ in delivering the Dec. 15 complaint indicated Arpaio’s office would have only two months to comply – timing coincident with the scheduled February 2012 release of the Cold Case Posse’s investigation.
Arpaio reminded WND that he is a sheriff, elected by the voters of Maricopa County. As such, he is the chief law enforcement officer in the county, not an appointed law enforcement officer responsible to the mayor, a state attorney general or even to the attorney general of the United States.
“I report to the people of Maricopa County,” Arpaio said, “and I intend to continue enforcing the immigration laws of the state of Arizona as long as I hold this office.”
Arpaio attorney Popolizo also disclosed in his cover letter that DOJ attorney Roy Austin had privately apologized to MCSO that the DOJ appeared to be taking a political direction with the complaint against Arpaio.
“Mr. Austin’s private expression of gratitude [to the MCSO for cooperation in the DOJ investigation] was also accompanied by an apology,” Popolizo continued. “Mr. Austin specifically apologized to us for not being able to control the timing or manner of the announcement of the investigation’s finding, despite his earlier promise that if the MCSO fully cooperated with DOJ’s investigation, a politicization of this investigation would not occur.”
In the statement DOJ issued to WND, DOJ characterized Austin’s apology rather than deny that an apology had been made.
“Regarding your question on Deputy Assistant Attorney General Roy Austin, he apologized if [MCSO's] feelings were hurt by the public release of the findings, but he informed them that the Civil Rights Division always publicly releases the findings of its law enforcement investigations because it is absolutely crucial to tell the people in the relevant community what was found so that the community is a part of any necessary reform,” DOJ spokeswoman Xochita Hinojosa wrote to WND in an email.
DOJ refuses to show proof
The DOJ statement issued today makes clear it considers the complaints proved as alleged and sees no reason to provide the evidence to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office or the public.
“The Justice Department looks forward to sitting down with MCSO in the near future to discuss a path forward that contains a court enforceable agreement that will create the necessary sustainable reforms,” the DOJ statement began, indicating clearly the Obama administration has already judged Arpaio and the MCSO guilty.
As far as the DOJ is concerned, the only thing left to discuss is how fast Arpaio and his sheriff’s office intends to comply with DOJ demands.
“Our findings show a clear violation of the Constitution and federal law, and are more than sufficient to file a complaint against a law enforcement agency,” the DOJ statement concluded.
Discovery to compel DOJ to show its hand
Arpaio and the attorneys representing the MCSO remain confident that DOJ will not be able for long to avoid making public their evidence.
Since the DOJ and Arpaio’s office appear headed directly to federal court, the court proceedings can be expected to allow MCSO discovery – a legal process in which the federal judge will order DOJ to turn over to the MCSO all evidence obtained to substantiate the allegations of systematic civil rights violations.
Popolizo’s cover letter indicates that the MCSO anticipated DOJ might refuse to make its evidence public.
“We sincerely hope that the DOJ’s recent public stance regarding its refusal to disclose information relevant to this investigation, which starkly contrasts its private, yet deficient pledge to provide at least some information, is not the foreshadowing of a preordained, DOJ decision to file suit in the face of the MCSO’s mere request for information,” Popolizo wrote.
“Please know, however, that we stand ready to litigate this matter should the DOJ refuse to provide the information we seek.”
Popolizo further argued that it was unreasonable for DOJ to expect MCSO to make changes in policy by proceeding “in a vacuum” absent any documenting evidence that would substantiate and quantify the severity the allegations.
“If the DOJ chooses the litigation route, that route will lead the parties through discovery and result in the DOJ’s compelled provision of the information we now request to evaluate its findings and determine what changes at the MCSO may be necessary, if any,” Popolizo continued.
In total, the MCSO 38-page response made 106 specific requests for evidence backing up the allegations.
Typically, the attorneys representing the MCSO began each of the 106 requests with a broadly written demand, asking, for instance: “Please provide each and every fact, document, report, statement (recorded, handwritten, or typewritten), affidavits, writings of any kind, and any and all evidence upon which the DOJ relies.”
Attorneys representing the MCSO can be expected to make requests of this kind when asking the federal judge hearing the case for discovery rights.
Nov 29, 2011- 5:04 - Former Rep. Tom Tancredo on the importance of border security and how the candidates will approach the issue.
BASHIR: STOP GINGRICH’S FOOD STAMP RHETORIC BEFORE SOMEONE GETS KILLED
MSNBC host Martin Bashir rarely misses an opportunity to dramatize and string-together current Republican happenings with obscure incidents from the past. Example. On Friday Bashir made the arguably far-fetched comparison linking the murder of a black British teenager in 1993 to Newt Gingrich calling President Obama “the most effective food stamp president in American history.”
Former Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo discusses the extent of the investigation into the Department of Justice.
Recent Comments