All posts tagged Republicans

Obama’s Shameful War on Youth

President Obama’s taxpayer-financed re-election campaign roared into Colorado last week after tax-payer financed stops in North Carolina, Iowa and elsewhere. But give the man credit: Obama has achieved a near impossible contradiction by embodying and popularizing a new oxymoron. The abuse of Air Force One as a campaign platform is both stunning and blatant—and a transparent hypocrisy that only Obama could get away with.

President Barack Obama waves after speaking at the Coors Events Center on the CU-Boulder campus. (Photo by Casey A. Cass/University of Colorado)

The occasion for his Colorado campaign stop was another shot fired in his war on youth. That war has not received as much press attention as the Republicans’ alleged “war on women,” but that is not hard to understand. The first is real but ignored by the press, while the other is a rhetorical fabrication that serves the interests of the Obama campaign. No surprises here.

The “youth vote” is supposedly deep in Obama’s pocket, and suggesting otherwise is too heretical to disturb the slumber of the herd of lambs that passes for a bulldog press these days.

But let’s consider the crown jewel of the Obama campaign’s “youth appeal,” his pandering to college students who have large and growing student loan debts.

This past week Obama came west to speak on the campus of the University of Colorado at Boulder. What was the message offered by this paragon of social conscience? It was a straight-forward appeal to naked, monetary self-interest:  “Help me persuade the Republicans in Congress to extend the low interest rates on your student loans.”  How does that stack up against John Kennedy’s appeal to join the Peace Corps?

And how will this change to lower interest rates be managed without increasing the federal deficit? Obama proposes to fund this gift to students by increasing taxes on the people who create the jobs in our economy—small business. Again the hypocrisy: students are asked to rally for lower interest rates on their student loans by ignoring or denying the very predictable impact on jobs—their parents’ jobs, their neighbors’ jobs, and yes, their own future jobs.

In contrast to his 2008 “Hope and Change” appeal, the Obama campaign is now reduced to appealing to youth’s fears— well-founded fears of graduating with dismal prospects for a good-paying job.  According to a recent survey, over half of recent college graduates are either unemployed or underemployed. Will they blame George Bush or Obama’s anti-economy?

What’s that old saying among salesmen? “Sell the sizzle, not the steak.” But college graduates with an average of $25,000 in debt — and their worried parents — want more than sizzle on their plate, especially if the “Obama sizzle” is the Blame Bush mantra that has lost its flavor. Obama hopes students and their parents will forget not only Obama’s anti-jobs policies but also the fact that college tuition has risen 25% in the three years since his election.

The missing steak is starting to be noticed by young voters.  Obama’s pollsters are telling him about declining enthusiasm among the under thirty audiences compared to the feverish activism of 2008. Here’s a hint to David Axelrod: Students would not be so worried about the loan rates if they had any confidence in the Obama anti-economy.

“Follow your dreams,” Obama told the students assembled in Boulder last week. Well, it may be news to Obama and his team, but here in Colorado, few students have dreams of becoming community organizers funded by federal government grants.

College students have dreams of good jobs in the real world, but unfortunately for Obama’s campaign, those dreams are threatened by Obama’s anti-economy. Young voters are discovering that it is literally true that Obama does not care about job creation—unless it is a government funded job.  It doesn’t take a Ph.D. in economics to follow the dots between Obama’s planned tax increases and declining job creation in the world of America’s job creators, small business.

In any other era, a political appeal to naked self-interest on a college campus would be deemed crass and embarrassing, but to Obama, college youth are just one more voting block to be bribed with government goodies. But young people understand that after adding $5 trillion in new federal debt, Obama’s anti-economy is just not working.

What if you’re under thirty and NOT going to college? Good luck getting a good blue collar job in Obama’s world, where unemployment in the construction trades is above 20%.  But, hey, Obama’s EPA is hiring more lawyers, and we all know how “jobs-friendly” they are!

When a young voter in Michigan or Ohio or Florida fills up the gas tank on his Mini Cooper, is he thanking Obama for deliberately driving up gas prices to $5 a gallon? Or is he asking himself, “Do I really need a president who hopes for European gas prices of $8?”

Obama’s war on youth is the war of low expectations: instead of a nation of young entrepreneurs, Obama wants a nation of young bureaucrats — government clerks, poultry inspectors and IRS agents.  Yes, Uncle Obama can help you get a government grant if THAT is following your dream. But young Americans’ dreams are bigger than that.

“Hope and change”? Today’s young voters are starting to look at Obama’s anti-jobs economy and realize they need to PRAY for change.

In 2008, Obama’s promises seemed fresh and appealing to young voters. But in 2012, they will look instead at the cold reality of Obama’s abysmal performance.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Malkin To Romney: Stop Saying Obama Is A Nice Guy, He Is Not

Michelle Malkin: The thing that has changed phenomenally between 2008 and 2012, is that we don’t have to rely on Barack and Michelle Obama and their Alinskyite storytellers in the mainstream media and all of their operatives to set the tone and the storyline for this election. That is what underscores all of the victories that we’ve seen over the last four years on the right.

 

 

Conservatives online are not accepting these fables that have been shoved down our throat, the idea that Obama has brought us out of the light when he has plunged us deeper into the sinkhole of debt. That somehow Obama has opened up Washington, D.C. to make it as transparent and open as possible when they’ve done all of these deals and subverted the rule of law, behind closed doors.

That somehow Obama is more likable than any Republican and somehow he is a nice guy — I hate hearing this from Mitt Romney. He’s got to get this talking point out of his mouth. Barack Obama is not a nice guy. He has dealt brutally with the right, with people like Paul Ryan and brave Republicans who have been calling him to the carpet on all of the disgusting culture of corruption that has reigned and that’s the darkness that we have to get out of in November.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Flashback: Obama Warned Republicans, “Lay Off My Wife”…

This was a few months after Mooch declared, “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country.”

(May 19, 2008) — Sen. Barack Obama ripped into a Republican ad today that targets comments made by his wife, Michelle, and called the GOP tactic “low class” and “detestable.”

The Illinois senator told “Good Morning America” that he expects hardball tactics from the Republicans if he becomes the Democratic presidential nominee.

“But I also think these folks should lay off my wife,” he told “GMA” as his wife chuckled beside him.

Obama told “GMA” that he believes he will win a majority of the Democratic delegates once the votes are counted after Tuesday’s primaries in Kentucky and Oregon. Obama is favored in Oregon while rival Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York is expected to win Kentucky.

Obama was careful not to act as if he had already clinched the nomination, but he also tried to present himself as the candidate who will be taking on Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona in the fall.

The Republicans seem to have come to the same conclusion and a GOP Internet campaign in Tennessee has an ad featuring Michelle Obama’s comments during the long Democratic campaign that “for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country.”

Michelle Obama was asked about the ad on “GMA,” but her husband said, “Let me just interject on this.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Ex-lawmaker, Tom Tancredo, wants popular vote

La. ballots said meaningless

Via: The Advocate, BY MARK BALLARD
, member of the United States House of Represe...

Louisiana’s votes in the presidential election don’t really matter and, as a result, federal leaders pay little attention to the state, a former congressman from Colorado said Friday. Tom Tancredo, of Littleton, Colo., was in Baton Rouge pushing House Bill 1095 before the state Legislature that would join Louisiana to a national movement to elect the president of the United States by popular vote instead of through the Electoral College. “Why should a Louisiana Democrat even bother cast a vote for president?” asked Tancredo, who is lobbying for the National Popular Vote Bill. The majority of Louisiana voters likely will back whomever the Republican Party nominates, said Tancredo, echoing what pollsters, political observers and officials with both parties have said repeatedly. That means Louisiana’s eight electoral votes will go to the GOP candidate and the votes cast for the Democratic candidate will be ignored. Barack Obama received 782,989 votes or 40 percent of the 1.96 million cast in Louisiana for the November 2008 presidential election, according the Secretary of State’s office. But all of the state’s electors went to Republican John McCain, who received 1.15 million votes. Tancredo said almost all of the presidential candidates focus their visits – and advertising dollars – on the 15 or so “swing” states whose majorities are in doubt. After the election, the attention and policies of federal officials necessarily focus on those states, he said. For instance, Tancredo said federal response to the BP Deepwater Horizon explosion in April 2010 provides a good example. It wasn’t until the leaked oil started threatening the coast of Florida, a state whose electors are up for grabs every four years, that the federal government really became engaged, he said. That would change if the votes for the losing candidates in winner-take-all states like Louisiana went towards a national tally that would select the president, Tancredo said. Under the U.S. Constitution, a president is chosen by a majority of electoral votes, currently it’s 270 out of the 538 available. The idea presented by the founding fathers — before the advent of political parties — was for the electors to mull over possible candidates, Tancredo said. Louisiana is among the 48 states, and Washington, D.C., that awards all its electors as a single bloc to the candidate who wins the balloting in the state. HB1095 provides the legal procedures for awarding electors to candidates proportional to the popular vote totals and for joining a compact of other states willing to use the same procedures. The legislation would not eliminate the Electoral College. Tancredo said enough states are needed to join the compact so that the members, together, would have enough electoral votes to decide the election. Nine states have passed legislation to join the compact. This is not the first time Louisiana legislators have looked at this proposal. In 2011, the House and Governmental Affairs committee advanced the bill over the objections of Gov. Bobby Jindal’s office. But the legislation languished on the House calendar and was never voted upon by the full chamber. The National Popular Vote effort is distributing a brochure aimed at Republican legislators that says awarding electors by popular vote, rather than the current winner-take-all system, would help Republican presidential candidates because more GOP voters live in the states that go Democratic in national elections than vice versa.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Pathetic — President Obama: Apologizer-in-Chief

Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) spoke on the House floor today, comparing numerous apologies President Obama has delivered on behalf of the United States with other events that Obama has refused to acknowledge, let alone apologize for.

HT: Patrick Poole

Enhanced by Zemanta

Two Keystone Pipeline Proposals Rejected by Senate

Via: Roll Call

An amendment to the surface transportation bill offered by Sen. Ron Wyden (left) regarding the Keystone XL oil pipeline failed on the Senate floor this afternoon.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo

Updated: 5:21 p.m.

The Senate rejected competing partisan proposals to expedite approval of the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to Texas.

The GOP proposal, offered by Sen.John Hoeven (N.D.), would have granted approval of the pipeline and would not require any further environmental reviews by the State Department. The amendment, offered to the Senate surface transportation bill, needed 60 votes to pass but failed 56-42. Eleven Democrats joined the Republicans voting for the amendment.

A Democratic alternative from Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.) failed 34-64, with 13 Democrats voting with Republicans against the amendment.

Wyden’s amendment would have required the pipeline permit application to be approved or denied within 90 days of the completion of all analyses required by current law and executive orders. The Wyden proposal would also have mandated that all project construction materials be made in the U.S., and it would have banned companies from exporting oil from the pipeline. One of the key purposes of the pipeline is to allow TransCanada to export the oil extracted from Canadian tar sands to other countries.

Last year’s short-term deal to extend the payroll tax cut required the White House to make a decision on approval of the pipeline by the end of February. President Barack Obama rejected the project because he said the deadline to did not provide enough time to adequately review it. The White House recently announced that TransCanada would start building part of the pipeline from Oklahoma to Texas, and said it welcomed the company’s intention to reapply for the Canada-U.S. border permit.

The pipeline would transport an additional 830,000 barrels of oil per day to U.S. refineries on the Gulf Coast, including 100,000 barrels a day from the Bakken region of North Dakota and Montana, supporters argue.

In his quest to overturn the president’s February decision, Hoeven secured an opinion from the non-partisan Congressional Research Service confirming Congress’s constitutional authority to approve the project.

Democrats who joined Hoeven in supporting the amendment primarily hailed from states with robust energy industries. They were Sens. Max Baucus (Mont.), Mark Begich (Alaska), Bob Casey (Pa.), Kent Conrad (N.D.), Kay Hagan (N.C.), Mary Landrieu (La.), Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Claire McCaskill (Mo.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Jon Tester (Mont.) and Jim Webb (Va.).

Obama made calls to several lawmakers in order to ensure the Hoeven amendment would be defeated, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney confirmed today.

House and Senate Republicans charged that the president’s lobbying blitz would have the effect of killing the jobs that would be created by the pipeline construction project. They also accused him of undermining his own “all-of-the-above” energy strategy.

But Carney said the White House has made clear its position on the “purely ideological and political efforts to attach legislation regarding the Keystone pipeline to whatever some Members of Congress fancy at the time. … It is false advertising to suggest that somehow passing legislation and having it made law that Keystone ought to be approved is somehow A) going to have any impact on the price of gas at the pump … or B) is responsible policy in any way when there isn’t even a proposed route for that pipeline to travel.”

The Senate also defeated an amendment from Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) that would have delayed for 15 months Environmental Protection Agency rules regarding industrial boiler emissions. The delay is needed, supporters argued, in order to give the EPA time to rewrite the rules and to provide additional time for the facilities to comply after the rules are finalized. The amendment needed 60 votes to pass but failed 52-46.

A proposal from Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), which was defeated 46-52, would have increased oil and gas development by allowing the sale of leases throughout the Outer Continental Shelf, including off the coasts of Florida, California and Virginia.

Correction: March 8, 2012

An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that 11 Democrats voted against the Hoeven amendment.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tancredo on Kudlow: “Barrack Obama most left winged candidate we have ever had”

Begins at 6:45 mark.

Transcript: first up, it’s just under an hour before polls close in michigan, arizona later. cnbc’s john harwood joins us live from detroit. good evening, john? reporter: larry, there are some polls that will be open until 9:00 in michigan, as well so we’ll have to wait a bit for those results, but we already know this is a very, very close race in michigan. pretty high stakes for the norm nation. my take is that mitt romney wins michigan in arizona he’ll be the nominee, and i think he’ll be the nominee even if he loses michigan, but it will take longer and much rougher. both went after each other by name and mitt romney singling out rick santorum. mitt romney said he’s late to that party. i’m glad he ridiculoecognize is a campaign about the economy. it’s time for him to focus on the economy and for you to all say okay, if the economy is going to be the issue we focus who has the experience to actually get this economy going again? senator santorum is a nice guy, but he’s never had a job in the private sector. but, of course, rick santorum makes the argument that it’s not only about economic issues. social issues especially those conservative christians in the western and northern parts of this state are key targets for him and so he makes a much broader, tack on mitt romney for his health care plan and imp implications for social issues. it’s about government control of economic lives and regulating you, taxing you, forcing you to buy things and forcing their values on you and your religion. which, by the way, romney did to catholic hospitals in massachusetts by forcing them to distribute the morning-after pill. why would we give those issues away in this general election? at the core of what’s at stake in this country, why would we put someone out there who is uniquely unqualified to make that case? so we’ve still got a turnout operation going on. mitt romney, larry, is at the superior organization here as in other states and what rick santorum hopes is that some of those inflammatory comments he’s made may comp state by stirring up some of those conserve tich christians, evangelicals or tvangelicals. many that cross over from the tea party. thanks for this. now let’s turn to republican senior strategist steve schmitt. he was top dog in the mccain campaign in 2008. steve, welcome back to the show. you’re welcome, larry. i want to ask you about president obama a minute. president obama talking to the uaw says this, my bailouts of the car business saved detroit, saved michigan and saved the economy and steve, we are getting better consumer confidence and we are getting better jobs. the dow is over 13,000. let me just ask you, can obama really be beaten in a better economy? well, larry, it’s a closely-divided nation. it continues to be, this has been a terrible stretch for the republican candidates and a lot of good things are happening for the president and the real clear politics average has him up about five points over mitt romney and six points over rec santorum. it’s a close election, but boy do republicans have some work to do. we are talking about things that are irrelevant to the lives of average americans. we are ceding economic arguments to the president talking about 52-year-old speech that president kennedy did in houston and talking about contraception, making from senator santorum’s perspective and i think ludicrous charges about the president wanting people to go to college so they can be indoctrinated and so republicans will have to offer to win this election a pro-growth opportunity message that explains and defines what opportunity looks like to the american people in the 21st century. we need an update in a modern, conservative argument. steve, did mitt romney get that done. that’s still obama’s area of vulnerability and i presume the budget deficit and the debt also. no doubt. did mitt romney get that done in his economics club of detroit’s speech. was he able to sell it and will he be able to sell it? no, i don’t think he got it done and i don’t think he’ll be able to make the pivot until he gets into a general election contact. the season has been disappointing for a lot of reason, but i think it’s on the course that it is right now. we’ve not yet had the candidates looking over the horizon, explaining to the american people what a 21st-century vision of conservatism is. how do you create prosperity? how do you create opportunity. how do you resuscitate the manufacturing base in the country? you know, this race has been about small things and it’s been about personal attacks and one of the consequences of it, larry is we have a fractured conservative base in the republican party, but independents who had soured on the president just a few months ago are going back to them and they’re going back to them in a big way. so we’re going to be starting this general election whoever the nominee is in a pretty good sized hole of our own making. steve, extremism in the culture war doesn’t sound like a winning issue to me. is that going to play a role tonight. did santorum lose the lkt lkt ability argument because he’s gone too far on contraception, on prenatal care, on the jfk speech on four-year colleges and so forth. will that hurt santorum tonight? well, it should hurt santorum if republican voters are focused on beating president bush. let’s look at one state, larry, virginia. republicans have to win back virginia. northern virginia is a moderate swing state area. there is no market for these issues in the american electorate that rick santorum is talking about. this is the antithesis of limited government conservatism. i believe it was a mistake for the congress to intervene in a family court decision in florida with the terry schiavo deci with the terry schiavo decision, but you now see rick santorum out there on a daily basis talking about these issues which are mainstreaming schiavoism into all manner of different areas in the party and then he spent a paragraph or two paragraphs or three paragraphs explaining and that’s a recipe for disaster? apparently he reneged on the jfk thing so he’s coming and going. absolutely. you were great to give us your time tonight. i know you’re busy. thank you ever so much. thank you, larry. let’s bring in two more experts to make the case for romney and santorum. we have gop chairman and current romney backer saul onassis and former colorado republican congressman tom tancredo. tom tancredo, you heard steve schmitt. he had harsh words for your man and saying this was is the antithesis of limited government conservatism on jfk and contraception. what is your response to what steve schmitt said. most of the stuff will not be relevant come the general election. what both of those candidates are trying to do today, what four of them are trying to do and the two really and truly at the top of the heap are trying to win a primary and in the a primary election and in the republican primary you’re going to talk to conservatives and you’ll be more conservative than you would otherwise be. we’ve seen that happen a hundred times. in this case i think santorum really is the conservative and mitt romney is trying to be because you’re going after republican primary voters. after the primary’s over with we enter into a brand new phase, but let’s talk about the issue that came up in terms of the economy. i am concerned. i think we all should be that bill clinton’s admonition to his campaign, remember, it’s the economy, stupid. the economy’s being looking better. if it looks better, that’s right — it’s even — romney loses his main issue, right? that’s his thing. if the economy is better than you’ll fight it out over ideas. saul, let me ask you. steve schmitt did not think that mitt romney got the job done with the 20% tax cut and his overall economic plan to the detroit economics club, and i presume that that’s one of the reasons this race is too close to call, saul. what’s your take on that criticism? well, look, first of all, mitt romney’s argument is going over well in michigan. i’m cautiously optimist take he’s going win tonight. i think he’s doing extremely well in the messaging. i’ve been traveling around the state and yesterday i was listening to his pitch. they want to make sure we have jobs and we have a lot of midwestern states that are hurting economically. tom tancredo, democrats may be very important to this race today. michael moore is out on the tape some place saying all his friends are going vote for santorum because he’s the weaker candidate and they want to cause mischief. what about the democrat turnout, tom? how will that impact things? i don’t know. i understand that’s an interesting thing because i know the democratic party has done a robocall for that purpose to encourage people to vote for santorum and santorum has done a robocall to democrats asking them to vote for him. so one of the two — i mean, the democrats are hoping that if santorum is the weaker candidate, but i’m telling you you better be careful what you ask for, democrats. here’s the thing, honest to goodness, here’s what gives santorum an edge and perhaps in a different election with a different candidate or incumbent things would be different. against a clinton, probably santorum would not have much of a chance. this is not a bill clinton. this is barack obama. he is the most left-wing candidate that — i mean, candidate for re-election we have ever had. you don’t have a right wing candidate against a moderate and i’ll tell you, barack obama is far more left wing than santorum is right wing and when you get those two together america votes, i think — more to the right. i understand, but saul, i’ll give you the last word. basically, do you believe that mitt romney’s economic growth message, not only the 20% tax cut, but reforming entitlements, slashing spending, getting deficits and debt down, do you think that trumps the extreme culture war and is the best way to beat obama? that seems to be the issue this evening. absolutely. i think when mitt romney is talking about the economy and he’s talking about jobs he’s winning. when rick santorum has to bring in democrats, and labor to vote in his favor, republicans all over the country i think will reject santorum’s campaign tactics here. this is about the economy. if we focus barack obama and his message, if we can focus on the economy, gas prices, unemployment mitt romney’s going to win. i think that rick santorum is basically doing a disservice to the party right now. i think that he’s being a little bit hypocritical being the washington insider and trying to run as an outsider. if you want to draw contrast between obama and a republican candidate, mitt romney is coming from the outside and run a business and can run a state and make a difference. saul, thank you very much. tom tancredo, thank you again. coming up on kudlow, eric cantor reveals his jobs act to jump-start small business start-ups. next up, live and exclusive, turns out obama may agree with cantor. free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity. i think it’s a pretty good campaign message, too, on kudlow, we’ll issue right back.

Enhanced by Zemanta

DNC Chief Wasserman Schultz: Republicans Will Do Nothing To Lower Gas Prices Because They Only Want “More Drilling” For Oil…

Via: Zip: Errr, how else can we extract it from the Earth? — Osmosis? She also makes the absurd claim Republicans want America “dependent on foreign oil” when her leader prevents us from tapping our resources.  Defies logic.

(The Hill) — Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said Thursday that GOP White House hopefuls will do nothing to help consumers at the gasoline pump.

The Florida congresswoman’s comments come hours before President Obama is slated to give an energy speech in Miami aimed partly at rebutting GOP political attacks over rising gas prices. She said the GOP plans would keep the United States dependent on foreign oil.

“The Republican field, like Mitt Romney, thinks that we just need to remain tethered and dependent on foreign oil because all they would do is more and more drilling, which is a very shortsighted approach and it would do nothing to prevent people who are struggling to put $80 into their gas tanks to be able to make sure that that’s more affordable,” Wasserman Schultz said on MSNBC.

“And that is another example of how they are economically out of touch,” she said.

Wasserman Schultz, on MSNBC Thursday, defended Obama’s energy policy.

“President Obama has employed an all-of-the-above strategy. We have more domestic energy production in the United States today than we have ever had. We have investments in alternative energy, we are making sure that when it comes to solar and wind and other kinds of renewable fuels that Barack Obama is talking about, making sure we make those kinds of investments,” she said.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Democrats demand Ariz. governor testify on immigration

Via: Washington Times, By Stephen Dinan

Democrats have called on Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer to come testify before the Senate about her state’s immigration law, which is slated for a Supreme Court hearing later this year.

Ms. Brewer, who got into a finger-wagging exchange with President Obama earlier this year, has championed the law, which allows police to question the immigration status of those they engage in their regular duties.

In a letter to the governor, Sen. Charles Schumer, New York Democrat and chairman of the Senate’s immigration subcommittee, said the federal government has expanded the presence of Border Patrol agents in Arizona, and said he believes the situation is improving — contrary to what Ms. Brewer argues.

“As you frequently ask the President to visit the southern border to discuss border security, we expect that you will be eager to engage in a productive dialogue with the congressional committee responsible for acting upon any border security recommendations you provide,” Mr. Schumer wrote in a letter inviting the governor to appear.

The Obama administration sued to stop Arizona’s law, and lower courts have blocked most of it from taking effect. The Supreme Court has said it will take the case this year.

On Wednesday Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney called Arizona’s law “a model” for the rest of the country during a debate in Arizona.

And he and the rest of the GOP presidential field have vowed to drop the federal government’s lawsuit against the state.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Trevor Loudon’s Florida Speaking Itinerary – Additions and Corrections

New Zeal

Please check this update, as a couple of corrections have been made.

After attending CPAC in Washington DC, I’m launching my speaking tour of the US on St. Valentine’s Day in beautiful Florida.

I’ll be promoting my book, “Barack Obama and the enemies within,” speaking, doing media interviews and more research, until early May.

I will then return for another 3 month tour beginning around August.

Florida itinerary

Feb. 14th, South Florida 9/12 Group at the Lantana Library in Palm Beach County – contact person: Shannon Armstrong 561.506.5258

Feb. 16th, Volusia County Tea Party in Deland venue TBA – contact person: Diane Kepus 407.446.5724

Feb. 17th, Martin County Tea Party in Stuart at the Republican Party HQ in Stuart – contact person: Shona Darress 772.286.5955

Feb. 18th, non-speaking engagement in Atlantic Beach

Feb 19th, Brevard 912 Group not tea party group – Barbara Knick is the contact person at 321.253.3500 at 4:00 PM. Call Barbara for information on the venue.

Feb. 20th, Tri-County Tea Party at the Villages – contact person: Pam Dahl 352.350.6046

Feb. 21st, Manatee County Tea Party venue TBA – contact person: Letha 941.721.3922

Feb 22nd, Port St. Lucie 912 group – contact person: Leigh Lamson at the Club Med 19th Hole restaurant. Call Leigh at 772.342.0812 for time and directions, etc.

Feb 23rd, South Florida Conservatives are hosting Trevor at the Brasa Nova Steak House, 9610 SW 8th St., Miami. Call Marcos Sendon for time etc. Doug Giles of ClashRadio will introduce Trevor.

Feb 25th, Fort Lauderdale Tea Party will host Trevor at Nick’s Italian restaurant on Oakland Blvd at 3:00 PM. Call Danita Kilcullen at 954.801.3432 for exact address.
3:00-5:00 PM (Doors open at 2:45 PM)

RSVP EVENT – LIMITED SEATING – TICKETS WILL BE SOLD IN ADVANCE
Tickets can be purchased by cash (preferred) directly from Danita or
Send your RSVP to TeaPartyFTL@gmail.com.

Once you’re confirmed by e-mail, we will send you instructions as to how
to make out your check and where to mail it. E-mail us any questions.
Pre-sold tickets $20.00 ($25.00 at the door)

Price Includes Buffet Style Meal – Drinks Extra

Enhanced by Zemanta